Why I Disagree With All 5 Points of Calvinism

Calvinism, a theological system developed by John Calvin in the 16th century, has been a topic of debate and discussion among Christians for centuries. While many embrace its teachings, I find myself in disagreement with all five points of Calvinism. In this article, I will present my arguments against each point, supported by research, examples, and case studies.

1. Total Depravity

The first point of Calvinism asserts that all humans are born in a state of total depravity, meaning that they are completely corrupted by sin and incapable of choosing God without divine intervention. While I acknowledge the existence of sin and its impact on humanity, I believe that humans still possess the ability to make moral choices and seek God.

Research has shown that individuals have the capacity for empathy, compassion, and altruism, which contradicts the notion of total depravity. Studies have also demonstrated that people from various religious backgrounds actively seek spiritual fulfillment and engage in practices that align with their beliefs.

Example: A study conducted by the Pew Research Center found that 84% of the global population identifies with a religious group, indicating a universal desire for spiritual connection.
Case Study: Mother Teresa, known for her selfless acts of service, dedicated her life to helping the poor and marginalized, demonstrating the potential for goodness within humanity.

2. Unconditional Election

The second point of Calvinism states that God chooses certain individuals for salvation without any consideration of their actions or merits. This concept of unconditional election raises questions about God’s justice and fairness.

While I believe in God’s sovereignty, I also believe in the importance of human free will. The Bible repeatedly emphasizes the need for repentance, faith, and obedience, suggesting that our choices and actions play a role in our salvation.

Example: In the parable of the prodigal son, Jesus portrays a father who eagerly welcomes his wayward son back after he repents and returns home. This story highlights the significance of personal choice and the potential for redemption.
Case Study: The life of the apostle Paul, who went from persecuting Christians to becoming one of the most influential figures in early Christianity, demonstrates the transformative power of personal choice and God’s grace.

3. Limited Atonement

The third point of Calvinism asserts that Jesus Christ’s sacrifice on the cross was intended only for the elect, those predestined for salvation. This view contradicts the biblical message of God’s love and desire for the salvation of all people.

The Bible repeatedly emphasizes God’s universal love and invitation to salvation. Verses such as John 3:16 state that “God so loved the world” and 1 Timothy 2:4 declares that God “desires all people to be saved.” These passages indicate that Jesus’ sacrifice was not limited to a select few but offered to all humanity.

Example: The story of the Samaritan woman at the well, found in John 4, demonstrates Jesus’ willingness to engage with and offer salvation to individuals outside of the Jewish community, challenging the notion of limited atonement.
Case Study: The missionary efforts of individuals and organizations throughout history, such as William Carey and modern-day missions, reflect the belief in the universal scope of Christ’s sacrifice and the desire to share the gospel with all people.

4. Irresistible Grace

The fourth point of Calvinism suggests that God’s grace is irresistible and that those whom God has chosen for salvation cannot resist His call. While I acknowledge the transformative power of God’s grace, I believe that humans still possess the ability to reject or accept His offer of salvation.

Throughout the Bible, individuals are presented with choices and are held accountable for their decisions. The concept of irresistible grace undermines the importance of personal responsibility and the need for genuine faith.

Example: The parable of the sower, found in Matthew 13, illustrates different responses to the message of the kingdom of God. Some individuals receive the message with joy but later fall away, highlighting the role of personal choice in accepting or rejecting God’s grace.
Case Study: The story of Judas Iscariot, one of Jesus’ disciples who betrayed Him, demonstrates the potential for individuals to resist God’s grace and make choices that lead to their own downfall.

5. Perseverance of the Saints

The final point of Calvinism asserts that those who are truly saved will persevere in their faith until the end. While I believe in the importance of perseverance, I also recognize the reality of human frailty and the potential for individuals to fall away from their faith.

The Bible warns against the dangers of spiritual complacency and encourages believers to actively pursue a relationship with God. The concept of perseverance of the saints can lead to a sense of false security and neglect of spiritual growth and accountability.

Example: The letters to the seven churches in Revelation 2-3 contain warnings and exhortations to believers, emphasizing the need for repentance, perseverance, and overcoming various challenges.
Case Study: The life of King Solomon, who started his reign with great wisdom and devotion to God but later turned away and embraced idolatry, serves as a cautionary tale about the potential for believers to fall away.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1. Does disagreeing with Calvinism mean rejecting all of its teachings?

No, disagreeing with Calvinism does not necessarily mean rejecting all of its teachings. It is possible to find value in certain aspects while holding different perspectives on specific points.

2. Can someone be a Christian and not believe in Calvinism?

Absolutely. Christianity encompasses a wide range of theological beliefs, and Calvinism is just one of many theological systems. One can be a Christian and hold different theological perspectives.

3. Does disagreeing with Calvinism mean denying God’s sovereignty?

No, disagreeing with Calvinism does not necessarily mean denying God’s sovereignty. It is possible to believe in God’s sovereignty while also affirming human free will and responsibility.

4. Are there any prominent theologians who disagree with Calvinism?

Yes, there are numerous prominent theologians throughout history who have expressed disagreement with Calvinism. Some notable examples include Jacob Arminius, John Wesley, and C.S. Lewis.

5. Can Calvinism and Arminianism coexist within Christianity?

While Calvinism and Arminianism represent contrasting theological perspectives, they can coexist within Christianity